TX900 vs COFDM for UAV Video Telemetry | OFDM vs COFDM Comparison

When selecting a wireless transmission solution for drones or UAVs, customers often ask about OFDM x COFDM, Pixhawk telemetry integration, and performance in obstructed environments. Here we answer the most common questions.


1º trimestre: Can TX900 be modified to use COFDM technology?

UMA: Não, TX900 is based on OFDM with TDD (Duplex por Divisão de Tempo). É otimizado para low-latency video and bidirectional telemetry and cannot be converted to COFDM.


2º trimestre: Why consider COFDM instead of OFDM?

COFDM is preferred when NLOS performance é crítico, such as in áreas urbanas, terreno montanhoso, or obstructed environments. Its advantages include:

  • Forte diffraction and multipath resistance
  • Reliable video transmission in harsh RF conditions
  • High stability in challenging environments

3º trimestre: OFDM vs COFDM – Key Differences

RecursoOFDM (TX900)COFDM
System ComplexityBaixoMais alto
LatênciaBaixo (controle em tempo real)Um pouco mais alto
Best EnvironmentLOS / Semi-LOSNLOS / Obstructed
Dados + VídeoBidirectional telemetry & Vídeo HDVideo-centric; telemetry may need adaptation
DúplexTDDUsually FDD

4º trimestre: COFDM Solutions for UAVs

If COFDM is needed, nós recomendamos:

Vcan1886 Mini COFDM Module

  • FDD-based COFDM transmission
  • Vídeo + data over Ethernet (RJ45)
  • Suitable for NLOS environments
    View Product

Customized High-Power COFDM Options:

  • 300–500 MHz COFDM IP RJ45 Transceiver, 10 Em PA
    View Product
  • 336–554 MHz COFDM IP FDD Transceiver, 5 Em PA
    View Product

Notas:

  • Larger/heavier enclosures – less suitable for small UAVs
  • RS232 data output only; Pixhawk requires RS232-to-TTL conversion

Q5: How to choose between TX900 (OFDM) and COFDM?

Choose TX900 (OFDM) se:

  • LOS or lightly obstructed environment
  • Low-latency video and telemetry is required
  • UAV size and weight are limited

Choose COFDM se:

  • NLOS or harsh environment
  • Diffraction and multipath resistance are critical
  • Slightly larger hardware is acceptable

Q6: Integrating COFDM with Pixhawk

  • RS232-to-TTL conversion may be needed
  • Integration requires planning due to limited data ports
  • Works best when NLOS reliability is more important than minimal latency

Conclusão:
TX900 OFDM modules are ideal for lightweight UAVs in LOS conditions, entregando low-latency video and telemetry. COFDM solutions provide better NLOS performance, but may require larger hardware and additional integration effort for Pixhawk telemetry.

Faça uma pergunta

← Voltar

Sua mensagem foi enviada