TX900 vs COFDM for UAV Video Telemetry | OFDM vs COFDM Comparison

When selecting a wireless transmission solution for drones or UAVs, customers often ask about OFDM vs COFDM, Pixhawk telemetry integration, and performance in obstructed environments. Here we answer the most common questions.


Q1: Can TX900 be modified to use COFDM technology?

SEBUAH: TIDAK, TX900 is based on OFDM with TDD (Dupleks Pembagian Waktu). It is optimized for low-latency video and bidirectional telemetry and cannot be converted to COFDM.


Q2: Why consider COFDM instead of OFDM?

COFDM is preferred when kinerja NLO sangat penting, such as in daerah perkotaan, mountainous terrain, or obstructed environments. Its advantages include:

  • Kuat diffraction and multipath resistance
  • Reliable video transmission in harsh RF conditions
  • High stability in challenging environments

Q3: OFDM vs COFDM – Key Differences

FiturOFDM (TX900)COFDM
System ComplexityRendahLebih tinggi
LatensiRendah (real-time control)Slightly higher
Best EnvironmentKEHILANGAN / Semi-LOSNLOS / Obstructed
Data + VideoBidirectional telemetry & video HDVideo-centric; telemetry may need adaptation
RangkapTDDUsually FDD

Q4: COFDM Solutions for UAVs

If COFDM is needed, kami merekomendasikan:

Vcan1886 Mini COFDM Module

  • FDD-based COFDM transmission
  • Video + data over Ethernet (RJ45)
  • Suitable for NLOS environments
    View Product

Customized High-Power COFDM Options:

  • 300–500 MHz COFDM IP RJ45 Transceiver, 10 Di PA
    View Product
  • 336–554 MHz COFDM IP FDD Transceiver, 5 Di PA
    View Product

Catatan:

  • Larger/heavier enclosures – less suitable for small UAVs
  • RS232 data output only; Pixhawk requires RS232-to-TTL conversion

P5: How to choose between TX900 (OFDM) and COFDM?

Choose TX900 (OFDM) jika:

  • LOS or lightly obstructed environment
  • Low-latency video and telemetry is required
  • UAV size and weight are limited

Choose COFDM jika:

  • NLOS or harsh environment
  • Diffraction and multipath resistance are critical
  • Slightly larger hardware is acceptable

Q6: Integrating COFDM with Pixhawk

  • RS232-to-TTL conversion may be needed
  • Integration requires planning due to limited data ports
  • Works best when NLOS reliability is more important than minimal latency

Kesimpulan:
TX900 OFDM modules are ideal for lightweight UAVs in LOS conditions, menyampaikan low-latency video and telemetry. COFDM solutions provide better NLOS performance, but may require larger hardware and additional integration effort for Pixhawk telemetry.

Berikan pertanyaan

← Kembali

Terima kasih atas tanggapan Anda. ✨